Re: Repo name
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2014 20:00:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Repo name | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.standards |
| Request: | Send a blank email to standards-+get-140@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>>>> +1 for php-lang, nice contrast to php-the/any-implementation.
>>>
>>> php-lang is nice, but I think php-spec is clearer. php-spec is the specification,
>>> php-src is the source code to implement it.
>>>
>> Yeah, which is why it was the obvious choice. Given phpspec's 7 year
>> usage history though, it's not unreasonable to ask us to pick
>> something non-conflicting (within reason). ((Can't blame them for
>> assuming there would never be a PHP specification :p ))
>
> Perhaps "php-langspec" covers all the concerns: short, clear, conflict-free.
I actually quite like it :)
But now that the initial draft has been pushed and links are
spreading... Is it still worth renaming?
If anyone makes an executive decision here then.. I can delete the
github repo and "move" it on git.php.net....
-Hannes