Re: Proxy server (and proxy users) receiving HTTP 403 when accessing www.php.net
| From: | james dot plouffe at tema dot toyota dot com | Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:35:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proxy server (and proxy users) receiving HTTP 403 when accessing www.php.net | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-14516@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Gents,
Thanks for your assistance on this: we only have 20 or so users sitting
behind the proxy so I agree that the traffic seems excessive.
I have passed the word to our development teams to take a look at what
might be going on to generate so much traffic and to correct the
situation.
Any chance we could get off the black list? Thanks
/JP
------------------------------------
James Plouffe, CISSP
Network Communications Development & Support
Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America
Ph: 734.695.3607
james.plouffe@tema.toyota.com
Hannes Magnusson <bjori@php.net>
Sent by: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com
08/15/2012 05:50 PM
To
james.plouffe@tema.toyota.com
cc
Daniel Brown <danbrown@php.net>, daniel.jackson@tema.toyota.com,
dave.watenpool@tema.toyota.com, parasane@gmail.com,
php-webmaster@lists.php.net, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>, PHP
Systems <systems@php.net>
Subject
Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Proxy server (and proxy users) receiving HTTP 403 when
accessing www.php.net
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Systems <systems@php.net> wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 01:47 PM, james.plouffe@tema.toyota.com wrote:
>>
>> Rasmus,
>> Do you have any background information on the nature of the traffic?
>> What volume of traffic or what type of requests would result in being
>> blocked?
>
> I had a quick look at the logs. I think this ip may have gone into the
> Deny rule along with 2 others under a particular heavy attack from some
> weird site crawlers out there. I remember sorting the log file by the
> most requests and blocking the top 3. Looking at the logs now, the
> traffic from your ip doesn't seem abusive, although there is a hell of a
> lot of it. How many users behind this proxy.
>
> For example, for a 1 second window in July I see:
>
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/datetime.formats.php HTTP/1.1" 200 11880
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/feeds/datetime.formats.atom HTTP/1.1" 200 1542
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/datetime.formats.time.php HTTP/1.1" 200 14996
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/datetime.formats.php HTTP/1.1" 200 11880
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/book.datetime.php HTTP/1.1" 200 32734
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /datetime.formats HTTP/1.1" 302 5
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/function.timezone-version-get.php HTTP/1.1" 200
18606
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/feeds/datetime.formats.atom HTTP/1.1" 200 1542
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/feeds/book.datetime.atom HTTP/1.1" 200 2912
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /datetime.formats.time HTTP/1.1" 302 5
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/intro.datetime.php HTTP/1.1" 200 11649
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/datetime.formats.php HTTP/1.1" 200 11880
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/datetime.formats.time.php HTTP/1.1" 200 14996
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/refs.calendar.php HTTP/1.1" 200 12901
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /datetime HTTP/1.1" 302 5
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/function.timezone-version-get.php HTTP/1.1" 200
18606
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/book.datetime.php HTTP/1.1" 200 32734
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/datetime.formats.date.php HTTP/1.1" 200 23639
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /timezone-version-get HTTP/1.1" 302 5
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/function.unixtojd.php HTTP/1.1" 200 21487
> www.access_log.1341273600.gz:63.238.139.239 - - [03/Jul/2012:07:45:33
> -0700] "GET /manual/en/function.timezone-transitions-get.php HTTP/1.1"
> 200 18974
>
> And why is it hitting the atom feeds? IDE out of control maybe? For a
> random 1-second snapshot this points to some serious traffic from you
guys.
>
The Atom feeds are probably Firefox users still using the Live bookmark
feature.
(and you are replying from systems@ again :))
-Hannes