Re: domxml002 test fails
| From: | Kevin Waterson | Date: | Sun, 15 Jun 2003 01:19:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: domxml002 test fails | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.xml.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-xml-dev+get-137@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
This one time, at band camp, Christian Stocker <chregu@bitflux.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Rob Richards wrote:
>
> > You should use with --with-dom (old domxml extension) or --with-dom5
> > and --wth-xsl (for the new dom and new xsl support) if you need xsl support.
> > Do not load the old and new extensions together. This can lead to unexpected
> > problems as many registered class names are the same.
>
> mmmh, so upgrading to dom5 has to happen for all applications at once on a
> php-installation... Not an ideal solution IMHO. But as I have not really
> time to look into that at the moment, nor any idea of how to solve that
> problem, I won't complain ;) (maybe namespaces would have been a solution,
> but that's too late now...)
This could prove difficult for hosts..
does the --with-xsl replace the need for --with-dom-xslt?
anyway, I configure --with-dom5 and --with-xsl and I am back to
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: domxml_new_xmldoc()
and the domxml functions do not show in get_defined_functions
if I configure --with-dom=/usr and --with-dom5 --with-xsl I get
[Sun Jun 15 11:07:32 2003] [notice] child pid 2099 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
but, the domxml functions do appear in get_defined_functions()
Kind regards
Kevin
--
______
(_____ \
_____) ) ____ ____ ____ ____
| ____/ / _ ) / _ | / ___) / _ )
| | ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ /
|_| \____) \_||_| \____) \____)
Kevin Waterson
Port Macquarie, Australia