Re: Re: CVS ACL's have been activated

> > > At 20:52 8/1/2001, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > > > I think the issue here is that Manuel expects *us* to figure > > > > out why *his* proposal is good. If he would present more > > > > reasoning instead of bickering, he would have much more > > > > success. > > > > > > > > > He pointed out it was a cool thing in his initial post, which was > > > immediately answered by a definite 'no', not a 'why?'... > > > >It was answered with a "I know this code inside out". > > "I know this code inside out, so no." > > >I really don't see who has the cycles to do all the work that this would > >require. Forcing everybody to change the way they do things when the > >current system does the job. It doesn't sound like a good idea to me. > > I agree with you that right now it's a bad idea to start messing with it, > mainly because nobody has time for it. It doesn't mean we shouldn't look > at it in the future, when we do have time. True, but my point is that I have already looked at it extensively. In its current state the amount of work involved for us is large. Sure, if in the future they make it easier to drop into our environment we should of course revisit it. -Rasmus