Re: phpdoc?

From: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 17:32:08 +0000
Subject: Re: phpdoc?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-10906@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Kristian Koehntopp wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 05:25:23PM +0200, Egon Schmid wrote: > > > Is it possible to incorporate these changes into the autoconf process? > > > > No! You should have only one CATALOG file in your system. Append > > CATALOG.docbk30 to your CATALOG file and check the installation with > > xemacs psgml-mode. > > There is no emacs on my system. I have never used emacs. There are RPMs with emacs or xemacs. > Anyway, I have catenated the CATALOG* files of Suse 6.2 into a combined > file. > Unlike using the "-c ..." option this produces warnings: > > kris@valiant:~/Source/phpdoc > make bigmanual.html > touch .manual.sgml > jade -V nochunks -d ./html.dsl -t sgml ./manual.sgml > bigmanual.html > jade:/usr/share/sgml/CATALOG:81:0:W: DTDDECL catalog entries are not supported > jade:/var/lib/sgml/CATALOG.docbk31:24:0:W: DTDDECL catalog entries are not supported > [ repeat ... ] You are mixing version 3.0 and version 3.1 of DocBook. The first line in manual.sgml should tell you to use version 3.0 > I think I'll be using the "-c ..." solution on my system. > > Also, it is normal that jade is so much slower than for example > TeX and groff on the same installation? And why is this the > case? It is almost like back in these C64 days... Ask James Clark or Norman Walsh. -Egon

« previous php.dev (#10906) next »