Re: phpdoc?
| From: | Egon Schmid | Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 1999 17:32:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: phpdoc? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-10906@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 05:25:23PM +0200, Egon Schmid wrote:
> > > Is it possible to incorporate these changes into the autoconf process?
> >
> > No! You should have only one CATALOG file in your system. Append
> > CATALOG.docbk30 to your CATALOG file and check the installation with
> > xemacs psgml-mode.
>
> There is no emacs on my system. I have never used emacs.
There are RPMs with emacs or xemacs.
> Anyway, I have catenated the CATALOG* files of Suse 6.2 into a combined
> file.
> Unlike using the "-c ..." option this produces warnings:
>
> kris@valiant:~/Source/phpdoc > make bigmanual.html
> touch .manual.sgml
> jade -V nochunks -d ./html.dsl -t sgml ./manual.sgml > bigmanual.html
> jade:/usr/share/sgml/CATALOG:81:0:W: DTDDECL catalog entries are not supported
> jade:/var/lib/sgml/CATALOG.docbk31:24:0:W: DTDDECL catalog entries are not supported
> [ repeat ... ]
You are mixing version 3.0 and version 3.1 of DocBook. The first line in
manual.sgml should tell you to use version 3.0
> I think I'll be using the "-c ..." solution on my system.
>
> Also, it is normal that jade is so much slower than for example
> TeX and groff on the same installation? And why is this the
> case? It is almost like back in these C64 days...
Ask James Clark or Norman Walsh.
-Egon