Re: phpdoc?

From: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:02:55 +0000
Subject: Re: phpdoc?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-10924@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hey guys, knock it off. We want as many people as possible to be able to build the documentation from its source, since that makes it easier for them to contribute. I don't see any rational reason for Kristian to back out the comments that explain how to make things work with Suse 6.2, particularly since they don't impact anyone else at all. They're comments. (And someone should document the fact that the changes being suggested for docbook.dcl aren't necessarily the best way to handle things. You can also just comment out the SGMLDECL line from the part of the catalog that comes from the DocBook stylesheets.) Jim Egon Schmid wrote: > Kristian Koehntopp wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 07:32:08PM +0200, Egon Schmid wrote: > > > You are mixing version 3.0 and version 3.1 of DocBook. The first line in > > > manual.sgml should tell you to use version 3.0 > > > > Using a single CATALOG when 3.0 and 3.1 are installed seems to > > do this. Calling jade with "-c ..." allows me to select between > > different CATALOG-files without collisions. I have added a > > suitable option to the Makefile.in in phpdoc, but that option is > > disabled by default. > > This is pure nonsense. Please reverse that patch. If not, I am able to > commit my version of manual.sgml. It is based on DocBook 3.1.

« previous php.dev (#10924) next »