Re: Implementation (simple!) operator overloading

> Uhm, unreadable? > the &?& stuff was unreadable, this to my opinion is > pretty much straight to the point.. add/substract something > from an object and cause a function to be called for this.. > I think you'd make the C++ programmers happy:-) What I dislike about operator overloading is how they can mean different things to different people. Since the operator doesn't say what it does, that makes the code less readable unless you did the overloading yourself so you _know_ what it is going to do. Given a date object $d and a person object $p, what does $d + $p mean? Or $d * $p? Emile