Re: Implementation (simple!) operator overloading

> > I like OO capabilities in PHP, am using them more and more. But operator > > overloading != OOP. > > Well, in my implementation it is, you can only specify > operator overloading functions in a class and for now > in this situation: $c = $a + $b; It'd only work when $a == IS_OBJECT; > > This way: $c = 10 + 10; isn't getting a different meaning. It still doesn't tell me what $b is and what $c will be. > This is the way it works right now.. (code is done, yes.) > But ehm, the PHP OO stuff like I would be willing to add stuff > to it, since I like messing around with it.. But I'd fall back on > C++ features again, private vars, protected vars, public vars.. > > With you all loving java I figure you don't like this, do you :-) Private vars would be a Good Thing, protected should have never made it to the C++ spec. IMHO of course. Emile