Re: Implementation (simple!) operator overloading

Well, you do the overloading yourself right, you write the function to be called when we encounter an overloaded function.. On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Emiliano wrote: > > > > Uhm, unreadable? > > the &?& stuff was unreadable, this to my opinion is > > pretty much straight to the point.. add/substract something > > from an object and cause a function to be called for this.. > > I think you'd make the C++ programmers happy:-) > > What I dislike about operator overloading is how they can mean > different things to different people. Since the operator doesn't say what > it does, that makes the code less readable unless you did the overloading > yourself so you _know_ what it is going to do. Given a date object $d and > a person object $p, what does $d + $p mean? Or $d * $p? > > Emile > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >