Re: CVS Account Request
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Wed, 15 Nov 2000 21:59:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: CVS Account Request | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-38215@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 23:45 15/11/2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Hrm, how does that apply to our case? It's not an isolated CVS, fuckups there could very well affect millions of web sites.I do. If ACL's are powerful enough, giving extension coders access only to their extension is a good idea as well. If people don't take it 'personally' as some sort of an insult, but take it for what it is - give them access to what they need access to - things will be much better off. Much like you don't give your friends root access, not because you think they'll screw things up, but because you just don't.We can regulate the access to various modules using ACLs. No need to divide repositories per se. Having said that, I see currently no reason to regulate that much further.I wouldn't mind giving anyone root access on an isolated box with backups and detailed logs available.
That is exactly the situation we face with CVS today. If
someone screws up, just replay your backup.
That is, if you notice it. I'm willing to bet that in the long run, you won't.
Zeev
--
Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
CTO, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/