Re: CVS Account Request
| From: | Jason Greene | Date: | Thu, 16 Nov 2000 01:39:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: CVS Account Request | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-38269@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It looks like my message was deleayed...., but I see it just arrived.
Also, I would like to point out (as far as exploits being imbeded into source) that CVS
commits are still developmental, and php still has to go through the full Release/Review
process.
I do agree that having a security policy is good, and some protection is always usefull.
If someone is really wanting to contribute, they will be fine waiting for an account.
Its also a good experience when your starting off to run patches by a developer whos
more experienced with the code your modifing. This really is a good process, if for no
other reason than allowing the newcomer to learn the style and form of the project.
-Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com>
To: "Rasmus Lerdorf" <rasmus@php.net>
Cc: "Sterling Hughes" <Sterling.Hughes@pentap.net>; <php-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request
> At 01:24 16/11/2000, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >But how do we do that? By reducing the number of commits? That doesn't
> >sound like the right answer to me.
>
> No, by making it a bit more difficult for an infiltrator to get in, and if
> he does, reduce the amount of damage he can do. As Jason said, people who
> actually want to work on PHP can live easily with the need to send patches
> for a couple of weeks, and accept CVS write access either. I think that
> they would actually think it's a good practice, and the way an organized
> project should be working in anyway (again, see what Jason said).
> I also think that someone who receives CVS access to develop a module for
> FooSQL, won't find it insulting or weird if he only got access to the
> ext/foosql directory on the repository.
>
> >That's not entirely true. Yes, doc people and lately pear people have had
> >semi-automatic cvs accounts created. I have had dozens of exchanges with
> >people wanting to contribute to the codebase before setting up the cvs
> >account. But we could formalize this and write it down somewhere.
>
>
> Well, a part of that could be that none of us ever saw these exchanges, or
> even knew of their existence. It seemed that sometimes, from the time
> requests showed up on group@ and till the time you added people to the CVS
> writers, it took less than a day...
> At any rate, if that's how things work anyway, it may be a good idea to
> formalize it as you said, or perhaps more these discussions over to php-dev
> as well. It can end up being useful.
>
> Zeev
>
> Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
> CTO, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
>