Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant
> Would you like to have sex with me if I dressed up like a ballerina and
> called myself Bob?
> ????
> http://www.b0g.org/?sec=files&id=424&nid=423
> (come on guys, we get so few of these wonderful gents per year, let me
> have *some* fun ;)
hehe...
;)
disi
Thread (49 messages)
joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 05:36:40 +0000 joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 08:40:11 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 08:45:37 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 08:49:37 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 09:11:28 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 09:28:05 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 09:36:26 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 09:58:54 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 10:22:08 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 10:33:29 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 10:44:09 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant joel at intwebservices dot com Tue, 22 May 2001 11:24:19 +0000 Re: Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant