Re: [UPDATE] NGScan

From: Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 17:54:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [UPDATE] NGScan
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-59365@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 20:29 9/7/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Abstracting PHP to work with multiple scanners, or putting a scanner outside the scripting engine, both make no sense. I don't want to see something which is purely wrong from a technical standpoint, done because of some licensing issue. I don't see why abstracting PHP to work with multiple scanners, or better yet, multiple engines is a bad idea.
Let's not divert the discussion to yet-another-completely-hypothetical-and-useless discussion, please, shall we? We're dealing with a very real-world situation here, in which a piece of software that does *exactly* the same thing is now available. Why not have abstraction for it? I don't know, perhaps because it just makes no sense? Think about it for a while, perhaps you'd realize that; I don't think I can explain this in any better way. Perhaps somebody else on this list can help me? Zeev

Thread (66 messages)

« previous php.dev (#59365) next »