Re: Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)

What about using the acronyms in any combination..... like $_GPC and $_GC and etc.... -Jason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cynic" <cynic@mail.cz> To: "Jani Taskinen" <sniper@iki.fi> Cc: "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com>; <php-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:25 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...) > At 20:14 8/8/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote the following: > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Cynic wrote: > > > >>How about $_DONT_TOUCH_THIS ? :) > >>Seriously though, I vote for $_REQUEST. After all, it contains > >>data which is (generally) tied to one particular request... > > > >This reminds me that should the $_FILES be included in this > >data too? As it's also something you shouldn't trust and > >it's also coming from the user. > > > >--Jani > > Yeah. And $_SESSION too. > > > > cynic@mail.cz > ------------- > And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files > were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files. > - Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7 > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >