Re: Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Wed, 08 Aug 2001 18:20:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-62600@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
My top of the list is:
$_REQUEST
$_EVIL (Andi and I think it's really pretty good, but we both figured we'll end up going with a different alternative :)
Zeev
At 21:12 08-08-01, Jason Greene wrote:
What about using the acronyms in any combination..... like $_GPC and $_GC and etc.... -Jason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cynic" <cynic@mail.cz> To: "Jani Taskinen" <sniper@iki.fi> Cc: "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com>; <php-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:25 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...) At 20:14 8/8/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Cynic wrote:Yeah. And $_SESSION too. cynic@mail.cz ------------- And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.This reminds me that should the $_FILES be included in this data too? As it's also something you shouldn't trust and it's also coming from the user. --JaniHow about $_DONT_TOUCH_THIS ? :) Seriously though, I vote for $_REQUEST. After all, it contains data which is (generally) tied to one particular request...- Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net