Re: PATCH: debug_backtrace() function for 4.3-dev/ZE1
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:45:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: debug_backtrace() function for 4.3-dev/ZE1 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-87063@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 11:36 19/08/2002, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
my apache 2.0 thing got misinterpreted a bit - let me
clearify: apache2.0 is ready, it works and it's even better
than 1.3 (the httpd itself). but ppls don't upgrade all
threir servers immediatly. as rasmus mentioned, the same
thing will happen once PHP5 comes out. it won't be widely
used and available to everybody the day it comes out.
I don't think it was misinterpreted at all, I (and I think Andi too) just disagree with this completely :)
Apache 2.0 is a full rewrite. Whether it's actually better than Apache 1.x in terms of stability and proven track record is at best debatable. The switch to it involves major pains and requires learning of new terminology and configuration options, as well as taking the risk of using rewritten-from-almost-scratch software. None of these apply to PHP 5.
c'monHow often do you call a function that gives you your current backtrace in C? In my many years of C experience, I would have to say that the accurate answer is -0- times. You really should compare apples with apples... Zeevhow often do you type "bt" in gdb?