Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf
| From: | Adam Wright | Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:14:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-93481@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Agreed in general. And whilst I'm here can I throw in my 2c about "Bogus"?
Although an accurate description, it's hardly likely to be perceived as
friendly. If you've taken the time to report a bug, even if you are in
error, having it thrown back as "Bogus" seems pretty mean. How about a less
antagonistic wording? I'd put forward something like "NotaBug", which gives
the same information without putting people's backs up.
adamw
----- Original Message -----
From: <m.ford@lmu.ac.uk>
To: <php-bugs@lists.php.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:01 PM
Subject: #21659 [Com]: sprintf
> ID: 21659
> Comment by: m.ford@lmu.ac.uk
> Reported By: matteo@euronia.it
> Status: Bogus
> Bug Type: *General Issues
> Operating System: linux
> PHP Version: 4.3.0
> New Comment:
>
> Why has this bug been marked as Bogus when it's a Duplicate? It seems
> to be increasingly common for this to happen -- when did it become
> standard policy to set duplicate report to Bogus? This is very
> confusing, when there is still a Duplicate status in the system.
> Surely, if a bug is a duplicate of another, it's far better to set its
> status to Duplicate, so that it's obvious from a brief look that it
> *is* a duplicate (and it shows up in search results as such). Setting
> it to Bogus is bogus, because it's patently not Bogus if it's the same
> issue as an Open bug.
>
> And even if it is policy to set duplicate report to Bogus, that policy
> should be prominently documented, so that people don't get in a huff
> about bugs being dismissed as not a bug when their duplicate report is
> set to Bogus (which has happened more than once already!).
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mike
>
>
> Previous Comments:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [2003-01-15 08:13:43] derick@php.net
>
> See bug #21658, it's the same so this one is not needed -> bogus.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [2003-01-15 08:10:55] matteo@euronia.it
>
> Error with sprintf i obtain conversion from numbner in not printable
> caracter.
> various numebr of my application don't work now
>
> see above
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [2003-01-15 08:09:57] derick@php.net
>
> Please do not submit the same bug more than once. An existing
> bug report already describes this very problem. Even if you feel
> that your issue is somewhat different, the resolution is likely
> to be the same. Because of this, we hope you add your comments
> to the existing bug instead.
>
> Thank you for your interest in PHP.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [2003-01-15 08:08:41] matteo@euronia.it
>
> I obtain from php 4.30 and error using sprintf
>
> My php code generate
> a result file in which is it possible to see the bug:
>
>
> example:
>
>
>
> sprintf(%.3f,2.04204204204) = 0.0�0
> sprintf(%.3f,2.1981981982) = 000.000
> sprintf(%.3f,1.07507507508) = 1.000
> sprintf(%.3f,1.98498498498) = 0.000
> sprintf(%.3f,0.318318318318) = 0.000
> sprintf(%.3f,0.90990990991) = 1.000
> sprintf(%.3f,0.660660660661) = 0.000
> sprintf(%.3f,2.27327327327) = 000000.000
>
>
> sprintf generate strange non visible alfanumeric caracter
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> Edit this bug report at
> http://bugs.php.net/?id=21659&edit=1
>
>