Re: Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf

Last ditch effort of "NotAPHPBug"? ;) adamw ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derick Rethans" <derick@php.net> To: "Ilia A." <ilia@prohost.org> Cc: "Adam Wright" <adam@elysium.ltd.uk>; <php-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:21 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Ilia A. wrote: > > > On January 15, 2003 10:14 am, Adam Wright wrote: > > > Agreed in general. And whilst I'm here can I throw in my 2c about "Bogus"? > > > Although an accurate description, it's hardly likely to be perceived as > > > friendly. If you've taken the time to report a bug, even if you are in > > > error, having it thrown back as "Bogus" seems pretty mean. How about a less > > > antagonistic wording? I'd put forward something like "NotaBug", which gives > > > the same information without putting people's backs up. > > > > "NotaBug" or similar may lead to confusion. Quite often the issue may indeed > > be a bug, however it is not a bug in PHP and is therefor bogus. By marking > > such a bug report "NotaBug" may lead to confusion. > > IMO bogus is a fairly accurate representation of what the 'bogus' bug reports > > are, it is no more or less friendly then other bug status and is only a > > problem (less 'friendly') if you choose to make it such. > > +1 on on that, but I do think that when a bug is set to bogus the reason > why it is bogus should always be noted. > > Derick > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Derick Rethans > http://derickrethans.nl/ > PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals > http://php-mag.net/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >