Re: Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Ilia A. wrote: > On January 15, 2003 10:14 am, Adam Wright wrote: > > Agreed in general. And whilst I'm here can I throw in my 2c about "Bogus"? > > Although an accurate description, it's hardly likely to be perceived as > > friendly. If you've taken the time to report a bug, even if you are in > > error, having it thrown back as "Bogus" seems pretty mean. How about a less > > antagonistic wording? I'd put forward something like "NotaBug", which gives > > the same information without putting people's backs up. > > "NotaBug" or similar may lead to confusion. Quite often the issue may indeed > be a bug, however it is not a bug in PHP and is therefor bogus. By marking > such a bug report "NotaBug" may lead to confusion. > IMO bogus is a fairly accurate representation of what the 'bogus' bug reports > are, it is no more or less friendly then other bug status and is only a > problem (less 'friendly') if you choose to make it such. +1 on on that, but I do think that when a bug is set to bogus the reason why it is bogus should always be noted. Derick -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------