Re: Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf

On January 15, 2003 10:14 am, Adam Wright wrote: > Agreed in general. And whilst I'm here can I throw in my 2c about "Bogus"? > Although an accurate description, it's hardly likely to be perceived as > friendly. If you've taken the time to report a bug, even if you are in > error, having it thrown back as "Bogus" seems pretty mean. How about a less > antagonistic wording? I'd put forward something like "NotaBug", which gives > the same information without putting people's backs up. "NotaBug" or similar may lead to confusion. Quite often the issue may indeed be a bug, however it is not a bug in PHP and is therefor bogus. By marking such a bug report "NotaBug" may lead to confusion. IMO bogus is a fairly accurate representation of what the 'bogus' bug reports are, it is no more or less friendly then other bug status and is only a problem (less 'friendly') if you choose to make it such. Ilia