Re: RFC with pepr
| From: | Vincent Gevers | Date: | Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:00:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC with pepr | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc.web |
| Request: | Send a blank email to doc-web+get-166@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thursday 12 August 2004 17:35, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > then some auth system can be implented in the RFC system.
> >
> > should guests be allowed to vote and comment?
>
> no way!
but we want to allow guests to submit patches, right?
a simple if() would take care of that
>
>
> > PEAR uses auth_require() for the lowest access level, then $karma->has()
> is used for 'special' functions
> > the docweb system should be like that :)
> > this is the karma system:
>
> http://cvs.php.net/co.php/pearweb/include/Damblan/Karma.php?r=1.18
>
> Do we need different karma levels? I think not!
> If a user has a valid magic cookie can do anything. Or you were thinking in
> creating groups and restricting access some parts to some groups?.. Not a
> good idea IMHO!
bah, I always do things like this when I'm thinking..
docweb != pearweb we don't do the same. the only group that we need is a
trusted_devs array, allowing them to delete spam RFC proposals..
or we can create a special guest patch submit form
anyway, I'm going to try making the system accepting uploads.
the RFC system is not only for patches, but also for other changes..
I'm going to brainstorm about everything, save it and create something nice, I hope :)
- Vincent
>
> Nuno
>