Re: RFC with pepr

> On Thursday 12 August 2004 17:35, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > > then some auth system can be implented in the RFC system. > > > > > > should guests be allowed to vote and comment? > > > > no way! > > but we want to allow guests to submit patches, right? > a simple if() would take care of that Patches? What kind of patches? Patches to the docs? Patches to whats? Patches to the docs should go to the bug system IMHO. Uhm, I still don't understand the need for a guest account :) > > > PEAR uses auth_require() for the lowest access level, then $karma->has() > > is used for 'special' functions > > > the docweb system should be like that :) > > > this is the karma system: > > > > http://cvs.php.net/co.php/pearweb/include/Damblan/Karma.php?r=1.18 > > > > Do we need different karma levels? I think not! > > If a user has a valid magic cookie can do anything. Or you were thinking in > > creating groups and restricting access some parts to some groups?.. Not a > > good idea IMHO! > > bah, I always do things like this when I'm thinking.. > docweb != pearweb we don't do the same. the only group that we need is a > trusted_devs array, allowing them to delete spam RFC proposals.. > or we can create a special guest patch submit form Uhm, but why spam RFC proposals? Guest can't submit them? Only authenticated guys, that shouldn't do that! > anyway, I'm going to try making the system accepting uploads. > the RFC system is not only for patches, but also for other changes.. > I'm going to brainstorm about everything, save it and create something nice, I hope :) I'll try to make the login system this weekend, too. Nuno