RE: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /fr bookinfo.xml
| From: | Hojtsy Gábor | Date: | Tue, 07 Aug 2001 07:32:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /fr bookinfo.xml | ||
| Groups: | php.doc | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969336856@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>> Modified files:
>> /phpdoc/fr bookinfo.xml
>> Log:
>> Adding the revision tag
>
>Is that needed for translations?
>
>The reason I added them to 'en', was because translations are
>relative to a
>en-revision. For translations, that is not true. IMO, it is
>best if there is
>a En-Revision: 1.XX comment, which is manually updated and reflects the
>revision of the _english_ version, the translation is up-to-date to.
>
>Of course you can also add the $Revision tag if you think it is useful.
I too think that this is not needed for translations. I can't think of
any situation where I would use this. An En-version comment
will be at least usable :))
Goba