Re: Re: phpdoc /fr bookinfo.xml

From: Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 09:37:28 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: phpdoc /fr bookinfo.xml
References: 1  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969336866@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello Goba, Hojtsy gábor wrote: > >You're right. I use a tag like (proposed by Jeroen I think) > ><!-- up-to-date against phpdoc/en/chapters/security.xml:1.23 --> > >As soon as I have enough files with this tag, I'll write a > >simple script > >which shows me the priority (which file is farest behind) of > >"my" files. > >The more users in our language follow this, the more useful it will > be > >(but having a system and a common "living" it are different things > :). > > If we can make this a standard, this script will work for other > languages, > and will give much-much better results than the status.php (as it > checks > only the date). It will be even more better if we divide the files > into smaller > pieces as Hartmut suggested, as we can see every functions and > chapters > exact state. :)) Since a lang-parameter is no prob, we can use it also commonly. To make it a standard is another question. Since Jeoren proposed it, nobody contradicted, and he introduced the $Revision, I thought it is already some kind of standard. Since it isn't even within one language possible to force such a standard, I take it as an offer I for myself will use, and maybe (hopefully) others will follow if see the advantage. I'm also open to the smaller files, but like the former discussions showed, it didn't seem to result in a common agreement (since this is a change in the complete structure and has an impact to everyone, we'd need a common agreement). Cu, Thomas

« previous php.doc (#969336866) next »