Re: Re: phpdoc /fr bookinfo.xml

> But it shows, that others are also working on this issue. > > Maybe we should really try to agree on a common solution for this? I agree with Thomas. I'm sure that with some cooperation a nice solution can be reached. > Exactly that's the the wrong way. If the change in May 2000 was only a typo, > you might get a big hole if you check only the en-changes from that date till > now. Indeed, that's the main reason for all this. A date will not no, you need to manually keep track of en-revision. > You're right, the "meta information" is not necessary (I've just copied > it from nl/language/basic-syntax.xml :) Thanks for the honour, but I think my initial proposal is a bit cumbersome: there is in fact no need to include the english filename... Is <!-- EN-Revision: 1.1 --> a good idea? It is (on purpose) very similar to: <!-- $Revision: 1.1 $ --> > Maybe we can agree upon a > common style (esp. when we should have common script)? +1 Jeroen