Re: Re: smarty

From: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:25:13 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: smarty
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-183347@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
* Chris de Vidal <Chris@deVidal.tv> [2004-04-14 12:11:31 -0400]: <snip> > Hey PHP/Smarty templates aren't for everyone. No one said they were. But > for my next project I believe I'll be using native PHP as a template > engine. Well, I'm a little bit "unpolite" against smarty, since it seems that people tend to see it as "the best" (tm) and ignore other, probably better solutions. (its the same thing w/ mysql or mailman) One situation when I hit to the roof happened, when those folks, where I've learned patTemplate from (content-builder) loudly talked about switching to smarty. I know many folks (layouter's/designers) which use content-builder because it uses _patTemplate_, since they understand pattemplate much better than other's like smarty. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT services phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact@metux.de cellphone: +49 174 7066481 --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- DSL-Zugang ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------

« previous php.general (#183347) next »