Re: Re: smarty

Enrico Weigelt said: > Well, I'm a little bit "unpolite" against smarty, since it seems > that people tend to see it as "the best" (tm) and ignore other, > probably better solutions. (its the same thing w/ mysql or mailman) I'm "unpolite" against Smarty because I used to think PHP couldn't *easily* do most of* what Smarty can and that's simply not true. * By that I mean, as I have been stating, there are cases when Smarty just plain makes sense to use, even as a templating engine, and there are cases when I can template with native PHP with about the same effort as with Smarty. /dev/idal