Re: AW: [PHP] smarty
| From: | Richard Harb | Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:28:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: AW: [PHP] smarty | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-183631@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Could we please close the thread already?
I think in the previous week there's been everything said what there's
been to say. whoever is still interested in reading the same arguments
over and over should please take a look at the archives.
I value the opinion of every poster if (s)he has something to
contribute - but contribution also includes adding something not
already present in abundance.
... and I really don't want to killfile any members of this list.
Thanks
Richard
PS: sorry if it sounds kinda pissed.
Friday, April 16, 2004, 4:10:20 PM, you wrote:
> pete M said:
>> Smarty is a cool tool and lots of people use it. You have decided NOT to
>> use it.
> I don't believe you've read a word I've written.
> I've been trying to tell people like myself that one can easily template
> with PHP. I thought I *needed* Smarty or any nice templating engine to
> seperate business and presentation logic; I was wrong. I was ignorant and
> perhaps there are others like me.
> I've also been saying that I'll probably use Smarty in the future.
> Advantages: numerous time-saving built-in functions, performance (debatable)
> Disadvantages: must learn yet another language and work with that
> language's shortcomings.
> I never said I've decided NOT to use it. I've never said it wasn't a cool
> tool. Please read carefully.
> /dev/idal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk 2.0.5 Copyright (C) 2001 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment: ""
iQA/AwUBQH/ti0LEeLYDwe5mEQKW2ACeKc1lBSCJe4x8cMmbjt6Fii87koQAnRHl
q70qB+EHK8HlwhVnCok+wfTm
=NyMA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----