Re: CF vs PHP Debacle
| From: | Joe Stump | Date: | Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:53:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: CF vs PHP Debacle | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-22892@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well we run Solaris 8 on 4 Sparc 450MHz processors with 4GB of RAM (proceed with
the drooling ;o) - so I'm not sure. I know that the Linux box below that you
describe is about what we had and it was constantly at meltdown when we were
serving 1 million pages a day.
We use FreeBSD and I can't say I know how it compares to BSDi (though the two
HAVE merged ...). On our internal tests (ran with http_load from acme.com) we
noticed FreeBSD server about 10x the pages Linux served - and even then it
didn't crash, it just kept churning through them. Linux on the other hand would
barf and require a force reboot!
So to help answer your question I'll sum up my points:
1.) FreeBSD rules for serving webpages (Yahoo! uses it exclusively)
2.) Solaris == Slowaris on Intel (Do they support Intel anymore?)
3.) A quad Sparc with 4GB of RAM is fast! ;O)
--Joe
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 07:37:00AM -0300, Roy Nasser wrote:
> I found this pretty usefule as a comment, and agree to it in several
> aspects...
>
> We currently run a Metasearch engine, and we are running under RedHat 6.2 /
> PHP / MySQL / Apache. We get MySQL using pretty much all our CPU on several
> cases, what can be done for this? We have the following machine:
>
> Dual PIII 877
> 1GB RAM
> 3 36GB SCSI Drives (RAID5)
>
> We have purchased Solaris for Intel. Do you guys think it will be more
> stable? (We get some crashs when some process or another begins to eat up
> memort or cpu), and in general i believe that the system could be faster....
>
> As for FreeBSD, is that like BSDi? Are you running the free version? Please
> give me a help if you can....
>
> I had some problems compiling PHP 4.0.3pl1 on the Solaris/Intel, any known
> problems?
>
> Thks...
> I am sorry this has turned into more of an OS discussion, but it is
> important since our site runs off 95% Heavyly dynamic pages....
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Stump [mailto:joe@earth.care2.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 4:36 AM
> > To: php-general@lists.php.net
> > Subject: [PHP] CF vs PHP Debacle
> >
> >
> > To all who hard code CFM - I'm sorry about my blanket
> > statement, I was going
> > off of the relationships I have with about 10 CFM coders who
> > all give me blank
> > stares when I ask them how to code something in CFM (usually
> > a response like
> > "Well you hit this button, etc").
> >
> > One person said we should "expand our horizons", so to speak,
> > and use other
> > platforms. I personally use the very best I can get. I don't
> > use NT for mainy
> > reasons - on being that NT has never been as stable as Linux
> > (in my experiences)
> > and I don't use Win9x for my workstation because it's less
> > stable than NT.
> >
> > I don't use CFM because it makes absolutely no sense to me -
> > It looks like HTML
> > with if/else statements. Also (correct me if I'm wrong) it's
> > written in PERL,
> > which is in turn written in C++ (as of the latest verison
> > AFAIK), which would
> > make CFM a 3rd generation language. On top of that you have
> > to run a seperate
> > service for CFM. PHP on the other hand is written in C and
> > thus a 2nd generation
> > language and is ran from within Apache - no seperate
> > processes (AFAIK).
> >
> > Now let's look at perl - good language, lots of people I know
> > use it - but it
> > wasn't designed from the ground up to be a web language like
> > PHP was. It
> > doesn't have striptags(), etc. built right in (like PHP).
> > Also, again from
> > my experience, mod_perl doesn't scale that well.
> >
> > Of course you could always use C, but I don't have months to
> > write a web app,
> > I have days (if I'm lucky and design/mgmt isn't in my way).
> > So I choose PHP -
> > it's light, extensible, easy to understand, and EXTREMELY
> > logical (when was
> > the last time you said "I wish PHP did this ..."??)
> >
> > Sure I'm die hard about PHP - because it does EVERYTHING I
> > need it to - from
> > large scale web apps to backing up my email via crontab (the
> > PHP binary rules!).
> > I'm also die hard about Linux - but I recently had to come to
> > the conclusion
> > that Linux wasn't as great as I thought it was - FreeBSD
> > serves web pages about
> > 10x faster (from our in house tests) than Linux and we won't
> > even compare our
> > old linux DB to our new Sun 420R running Solaris with MySQL!
> > If something comes
> > along that is better than PHP I'll switch - until then I
> > support Rasthmus and
> > everthing that PHP is about.
> >
> > --Joe
> >
> > ==============================================================
> > ==================
> > = Joe Stump joestump98@yahoo.com
> http://www.miester.org =
> ============================================================================
> ====
> "Real programmers don't comment their code.
> It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand."
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
================================================================================
= Joe Stump joestump98@yahoo.com http://www.miester.org =
================================================================================
"Real programmers don't comment their code.
It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand."