Re: CSS vs. Tables OT
| From: | Anna V | Date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:28:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: CSS vs. Tables OT | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-253159@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 18:53 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: On Tuesday 17 April 2007 3:40 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:complicated projects)... Heck, http://espn.com is CSS based, and it looks pretty darn amazing. Just my quick thought on this. :) -- Anna Vester Web Designer http://www.veanndesign.comamount ofBTW, any web developer worth his or her salt with a reasonablelayoutspractice can make CSS layouts that resize as well as table basedhttp://www.csszengarden.com/everyday of the week. I will refer you toOnly with hacks.Using tables for layout *is* a hack. A common one, but still a hack. No, it's old school, the only way to do complex layout in the past. At least tables are backward and forward compatible. CSS is only semi-forward compatible. Cheers, Rob. I've never never had used tables for layouts (I worked on pretty