RE: [PHP] CSS vs. Tables OT
| From: | tedd | Date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:57:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] CSS vs. Tables OT | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-253190@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 4:40 PM -0400 4/17/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:45 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote:They're not hacks, they're features. :-) I agree with Jay. Leonard -- as far as 99% of the time for anything on the web, prove it. You can't -- your trolling. Leonard -- as far as resizing properly, what the hell are you talking about? The question is rhetorical I don't care to dwell on the lunacy of the statement -- take it to a css-discuss list. Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.comAt 3:40 PM -0400 4/17/07, Leonard Burton wrote: From the CSS discussion of the WWE job posting thread.There is one question that shows that a table based layout in 99% of cases is superior to a CSS layout. Try resizing most any CSS based page. Tables are 99% of the time superior as it will resize properly whereas 99% of most CSS based pages will not resize properly. When 99% of CSS layouts overcome this lunacy then CSS will be better, but not until then. BTW, any web developer worth his or her salt with a reasonable amount ofpractice can make CSS layouts that resize as well as table based layouts everyday of the week. I will refer you to http://www.csszengarden.com/Only with hacks.