Re: CSS vs. Tables OT

From:	Anna V	Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:03:31 +0000
Subject:	Re: CSS vs. Tables OT
References:	1 2 3 4 5 6	Groups:	php.general
Request:	Send a blank email to php-general+get-253163@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 21:28 -0500, Anna V wrote: On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 18:53 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 3:40 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:
BTW, any web developer worth his or her salt with a reasonable
amount of
practice can make CSS layouts that resize as well as table based
layouts
everyday of the week. I will refer you to
http://www.csszengarden.com/
Only with hacks.
Using tables for layout *is* a hack. A common one, but still a
hack.
No, it's old school, the only way to do complex layout in the past. At least tables are backward and forward compatible. CSS is only semi-forward compatible. Cheers, Rob.
I've never never had used tables for layouts (I worked on pretty complicated projects)... Heck, http://espn.com is CSS based, and it looks pretty darn amazing. Just my quick thought on this. :) They certainly use CSS AND they use table for the main layout. Thank you, thank you very much. Cheers, Rob. --

Looks like, the only table they use is for the ad_container. -- Anna Vester Web Designer http://www.veanndesign.com