Re: CSS vs. Tables OT

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 22:03 -0500, Anna V wrote: > > > On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 21:28 -0500, Anna V wrote: > > On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 18:53 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 3:40 pm, Robert Cummings wrote: > > > > > > > > > > BTW, any web developer worth his or her salt with a > reasonable > > > amount of > > > > > > practice can make CSS layouts that resize as well as > table based > > > layouts > > > > > > everyday of the week. I will refer you to > > > http://www.csszengarden.com/ > > > > > > > > > > Only with hacks. > > > > > > > > Using tables for layout *is* a hack. A common one, but > still a hack. > > > > > > No, it's old school, the only way to do complex layout in > the past. At > > > least tables are backward and forward compatible. CSS is > only > > > semi-forward compatible. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Rob. > > > > > > > > I've never never had used tables for layouts (I worked on > pretty > > complicated projects)... Heck, http://espn.com is > > CSS based, > and it looks > > pretty darn amazing. Just my quick thought on this. :) > > They certainly use CSS AND they use table for the main layout. > Thank > you, thank you very much. > > Cheers, > Rob. > -- > > Looks like, the only table they use is for the ad_container. It's still a table *lol*. Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------'