Re: The future of PHP -- accessory libraries

From: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:58:31 +0000
Subject: Re: The future of PHP -- accessory libraries
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-65098@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi folks I asked my ISP to flesh out their negative comments about adding libraries to PHP. This is their reply - is there anything in this, or are they misunderstanding the situation? >>>>>>>>> We run servers. We want to compile stuff from source, for obvious reasons! As such, the question is simple and obvious: why does so much in PHP rely on the core's compile-time. Why can't there be run-time or DSO inclusion later on, as with Perl. Basically, PHP has really screwed up in this monolythic design which was all very well when it was a simple templating system, but now it's grown to a full-grown language, the scalability, flexibility and namespace issues are becoming untennable. I note that something called "Pear" appears in later compilations of the PHP core. I assume this is some attempt at including Perl's library system and, eventually, a CPAN-a-like? >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not so sure why they prefer to compile from source - why wouldn't they trust a professional distro? Geoff Caplan

« previous php.general (#65098) next »