Re: PEAR IMAGICK [WAS-> RANT: Why doesn't PHP have built-in support for dynamic]
| From: | Christian Stocker | Date: | Sun, 03 Feb 2002 19:01:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR IMAGICK [WAS-> RANT: Why doesn't PHP have built-in support for dynamic] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-83321@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
In <3C5D821C.20203@tapinternet.com>, Michael Kimsal wrote:
> Weston Houghton wrote:
>
>> Anybody interested in working on a PEAR module to interface PHP with
>> something like ImageMagick directly? I would love to see it. Maybe if I
>> am unemployed long enough soon I can work on it myself. Not that I
>> really want that to happen...
>>
>> I think that might be the best solution for PHP's lack of image
>> functionality though...
>>
>> Wes
>>
>>
> Someone seems to have started this, although I'm not sure why he's not
> going more object-based.
>
>
> http://pear.php.net/manual/en/packages.imagick.php
>
> I would prefer something like
>
> $i = new Imagick();
> $i->read("file");
>
> instead of
> $i= imagick_create();
> imagick_read($i,"file");
it's open source. just do it more object orientated ... and i'm sure the
author (me...) will be very happy to impelement it ;)
honestly, OO-Interface was and still is planned, but i think
more functionality is much more needed at the moment than an oo
interface. it was my first extension, so i wanted to keep it simple for
the beginning.
but if someone else likes to implement it earlier, i'm the last, who has
a problem with that (and don't expect 00 soon from me ...)
chregu