Re: PEAR IMAGICK [WAS-> RANT: Why doesn't PHP have built-in support for dynamic]
| From: | Michael Kimsal | Date: | Mon, 04 Feb 2002 21:34:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR IMAGICK [WAS-> RANT: Why doesn't PHP have built-in support for dynamic] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-83461@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Christian Stocker wrote:
FWIW, I re-evaluated the situation, and I think I was mistaken- it's not a PHP exension you're writing, is it? It's just PHP code, like much of PEAR right? Or is it an actual extension that I'd compile in?see (which is how I labelled it above) and what I'm capable of actually contributing. Doing C-code PHP extensions is beyond my capabilities, so I make do with what others contribute. Simply because something is opensource doesn't mean everyone has equal talent to add in actual code. :( I thank you for your contribution of this code so far, and should you continue to work on it in whatever fashion you choose, so much the better. It is appreciated, OO or not (it would just be appreciated more if it was OO.) :)i would it appreciate as well, if it was OO. I was just not capable back then to do it OO, maybe i am the next time I invest more time in it. christian