Re: PEAR IMAGICK [WAS-> RANT: Why doesn't PHP have built-in support for dynamic]

In <3C5D9A4C.1060401@tapinternet.com>, Michael Kimsal wrote: >>>Someone seems to have started this, although I'm not sure why he's not >>>going more object-based. >>> >>> >>>http://pear.php.net/manual/en/packages.imagick.php >>> >>>I would prefer something like >>> >>>$i = new Imagick(); >>>$i->read("file"); >>> >>>instead of >>>$i= imagick_create(); >>>imagick_read($i,"file"); >>> >>> >> it's open source. just do it more object orientated ... and i'm sure >> the author (me...) will be very happy to impelement it ;) >> >> honestly, OO-Interface was and still is planned, but i think more >> functionality is much more needed at the moment than an oo interface. >> it was my first extension, so i wanted to keep it simple for the >> beginning. >> >> but if someone else likes to implement it earlier, i'm the last, who >> has a problem with that (and don't expect 00 soon from me ...) >> >> chregu >> >> >> > Hello - > > Please don't take my comment the wrong way - I know what I'd *like* to no, didn't take it the wrong way. maybe my answer was a bit to harsh ;) > see (which is how I labelled it above) and what I'm capable of actually > contributing. > Doing C-code PHP extensions is beyond my capabilities, so I make do with > what others contribute. Simply because something is opensource doesn't > mean everyone has equal talent to add in actual code. :( > I thank you for your contribution of this code so far, and should you > continue to work on it in whatever fashion you choose, so much the > better. It is appreciated, OO or not (it would just be appreciated more > if it was OO.) :) i would it appreciate as well, if it was OO. I was just not capable back then to do it OO, maybe i am the next time I invest more time in it. christian