Re: PEAR IMAGICK [WAS-> RANT: Why doesn't PHP have built-in support for dynamic]

In <3C5EFE49.2040509@tapinternet.com>, Michael Kimsal wrote: > Christian Stocker wrote: > > >>>see (which is how I labelled it above) and what I'm capable of actually >>>contributing. >>>Doing C-code PHP extensions is beyond my capabilities, so I make do >>>with what others contribute. Simply because something is opensource >>>doesn't mean everyone has equal talent to add in actual code. :( I >>>thank you for your contribution of this code so far, and should you >>>continue to work on it in whatever fashion you choose, so much the >>>better. It is appreciated, OO or not (it would just be appreciated >>>more if it was OO.) :) >>> >>> >> i would it appreciate as well, if it was OO. I was just not capable >> back then to do it OO, maybe i am the next time I invest more time in >> it. >> >> christian >> >> >> > FWIW, I re-evaluated the situation, and I think I was mistaken- it's not > a PHP exension you're writing, is it? It's just PHP code, like much of > PEAR right? Or is it an actual extension that I'd compile in? it's an actual extension, which has to be compiled in. chregu