Re: Re: ext/libglade complete?
| From: | Steph Fox | Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:35:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: ext/libglade complete? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-2001@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
So maybe we should look into adapting that idea from Perl... (as well)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Weiske" <cweiske@cweiske.de>
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>
Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Re: [PHP-GTK] ext/libglade complete?
> Steph,
>
> > Thing 2 is that there's already a way to achieve this. I don't see
what's
> > so problematic about having a callback in the Glade file called
> > 'MyApp::on_ok_clicked'... if you have some issue with the callbacks
being
> > public you can just move the whole lot, including the call to
gtk::main(),
> > inside the class and use self:: instead. What am I missing here?
>
> The problematic thing is that a /static/ function is called, not the one
> of the object instance. I don't need static calls, because programming
> object oriented means having *objects* and not only stateless functions
> which are defined in a class by accident.
>
> --
> Regards/MfG,
> Christian Weiske
>
> --
> PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>