Re: Re: ext/libglade complete?

Well, I wanted to try it first and see if it was a stupid idea or a brainwave - sometimes it's hard for me to tell the difference y'know :) The main thing is to force connect_object to be used internally for classes, right? And they're always going to be static calls, ie they'll be fed to ZE as arrays, so spotting them's straightforward. The bit I'm not sure about is whether self:: and parent:: need to call connect_object too... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrei Zmievski" <andrei@gravitonic.com> To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com> Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 8:58 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Re: [PHP-GTK] ext/libglade complete? > I think I do mind. Since we're discussing the design and > implementation, please share what it is you came up with. > > -Andrei > > > On Oct 30, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Steph Fox wrote: > > > OK, nm, I think I've come up with a better approach to this now... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com> > > To: "Andrei Zmievski" <andrei@gravitonic.com> > > Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net> > > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 7:42 PM > > Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Re: [PHP-GTK] ext/libglade complete? > > > > > > > >>> What do self:: and parent:: evaluate to when you call $glade- > >>> > >>>> signal_autoconnect()? > >>>> > >> > >> Dunno. It's clever internals stuff. It works :) > >> > >> > >>>> 5. What else has static methods that we're likely to want to use > >>>> in a > >>>> callback? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Any other extension, possibly. > >>> > >> > >> OK, so what should I be checking for there? > >> > >> - Steph > >> > > > > -- > > PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > -- > PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >