Re: Re: ext/libglade complete?
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:00:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: ext/libglade complete? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-2007@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Bah, isn't it what I suggested originally?
-Andrei
On Oct 30, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
So maybe we should look into adapting that idea from Perl... (as well) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Weiske" <cweiske@cweiske.de> To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com> Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Re: [PHP-GTK] ext/libglade complete?Steph,what'sThing 2 is that there's already a way to achieve this. I don't seebeingso problematic about having a callback in the Glade file called 'MyApp::on_ok_clicked'... if you have some issue with the callbacksgtk::main(),public you can just move the whole lot, including the call to--PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpinside the class and use self:: instead. What am I missing here?The problematic thing is that a /static/ function is called, not the one of the object instance. I don't need static calls, because programming object oriented means having *objects* and not only stateless functions which are defined in a class by accident. --Regards/MfG, Christian Weiske --PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php