Re: Counterargument to Short Tags Deprecation (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Deprecate PHP's short open tags V2)

From: Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 10:26:19 +0000
Subject: Re: Counterargument to Short Tags Deprecation (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Deprecate PHP's short open tags V2)
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-106383@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 23:51, Zeev Suraski <zeev@php.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:05 PM G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I'd prefer Dan's approach and having a seperate page linked at the top of > > the RFC. > > > > I'll start voting tomorrow and will link to your page in the same message > > as the voting announcement. > > > > Thanks George. I created a page with a counterargument to the deprecation > proposal here: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/counterargument/deprecate_php_short_tags > and > linked it from the RFC. > > If others have additional input to add there, please let me know. > Please keep this sort of content inside the relevant mailing list thread, we don't need yet more places to go hunting for comments on RFCs. I'm not sure what the value is of a dedicated wiki page is (for context, I have read Dan's thread suggesting the idea), other than to have a new soap box to shout from for the most loud voices. Key feedback to RFCs should at minimum appear in the respective discussion thread on the list. If it does, then this page is redundant. If it doesn't, then it should. > > Zeev >

« previous php.internals (#106383) next »