Re: [VOTE] Fibers
| From: | Levi Morrison via internals | Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:38:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] Fibers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-113676@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:13 AM Guilliam Xavier
<guilliam.xavier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Aaron Piotrowski <aaron@trowski.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 19, 2021, at 5:47 PM, Levi Morrison <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:54 PM Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com
>> > <mailto:me@kelunik.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey Levi,
>> >>
>> >>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:40 PM Aaron Piotrowski <aaron@trowski.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Greetings everyone!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vote has started on the fiber RFC:
>> >>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers <3ª1IãýH |¬¤(Kà
>> >>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Voting will run through March 22nd.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>> Aaron Piotrowski
>> >>>
>> >>> This is selfish, but I would like to kindly request lengthening the
>> >>> voting window to allow me more time to play with it. I feel like I
>> >>> can't vote "yes" on something like this without more experience
>> >>> with
>> >>> it (which is why I currently have voted "no"). I hope others would
>> >>> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> How much time do you think you need?
>> >
>> > Another week seems reasonable; enough time to evaluate it more
>> > thoroughly but not delay things seriously.
>>
>> This is fine with me. Let's extend voting for about another week, ending on 3/28 at
>> about 11 PM EDT.
>
>
> I'm afraid you can't: from
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#voting
>
> > A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not be changed
> > during the vote.
>
> (Not that I care personally, but you would take the risk of the vote being invalidated...)
>
> --
> Guilliam Xavier
We should dig through the history, because the line before that is in conflict:
> Votes should be open for two weeks at minimum, at the authors discretion this may be extended,
> for example during holiday periods.
> A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not be changed during
> the vote.