Re: [VOTE] Fibers

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:23 PM G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com> wrote: > > The thing is that by my recollections votes have already been extended. > Mostly when there has been issues with the mailing list, or some outside > event. > > Moreso, I don't think extending a vote will in most cases result in the > outcome > they want (acceptance), but I might be mistaken. In this case however it > is a > bit meaningless as it's already passing. > So I think if there needs to be a discussion about clarifying the voting > RFC > document it should be made in a different thread. > > Best regards, > > George P. Banyard > You're right. Sorry, I didn't intend to start a debate (nor to be rude to Levi), just being probably overly cautious ("better safe than sorry", I remembered that some people challenged the validity of votes on the basis of "bureaucratic" arguments in the past, and wanted to avoid that here)... (In this case I personally find it reasonable, but who am I?) Just in case, let's record that the result is currently 48:14 ;) -- Guilliam Xavier