Re: [VOTE] Fibers

From: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:55:38 +0000
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Fibers
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-113679@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 10:38, Levi Morrison via internals <internals@lists.php.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:13 AM Guilliam Xavier > <guilliam.xavier@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Aaron Piotrowski <aaron@trowski.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 19, 2021, at 5:47 PM, Levi Morrison <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:54 PM Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com >>>> <mailto:me@kelunik.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Levi, >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:40 PM Aaron Piotrowski <aaron@trowski.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greetings everyone! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The vote has started on the fiber RFC: >>>>>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers >>>>>>> <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Voting will run through March 22nd. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Aaron Piotrowski >>>>>> >>>>>> This is selfish, but I would like to kindly request lengthening the >>>>>> voting window to allow me more time to play with it. I feel like I >>>>>> can't vote "yes" on something like this without more >>>>>> experience with >>>>>> it (which is why I currently have voted "no"). I hope others >>>>>> would >>>>>> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How much time do you think you need? >>>> >>>> Another week seems reasonable; enough time to evaluate it more >>>> thoroughly but not delay things seriously. >>> >>> This is fine with me. Let's extend voting for about another week, ending on 3/28 >>> at about 11 PM EDT. >> >> >> I'm afraid you can't: from >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#voting >> >>> A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not be changed >>> during the vote. >> >> (Not that I care personally, but you would take the risk of the vote being invalidated...) >> >> -- >> Guilliam Xavier > > We should dig through the history, because the line before that is in conflict: > >> Votes should be open for two weeks at minimum, at the authors discretion this may be >> extended, for example during holiday periods. >> A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not be changed >> during the vote. I interpret that line to mean that the author may decide to extend the voting period prior to declaring the valid voting period when voting is started. I also cannot find anything in the rules that allows for the author canceling an ongoing vote, but I believe we’ve done that in the past. Cheers, Ben

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc
« previous php.internals (#113679) next »