Re: [RFC] is_literal
| From: | someniatko | Date: | Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:34:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] is_literal | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-114852@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Nevertheless, I am sure even without a dedicated type it is still a
valuable addition to the engine. Just to clarify, I understand that if
this would require too much additional work to implement the type, IMO
it's okay to ship the feature without it for now. I was just replying
to other arguments, which are not related to the work amount :P
Thank you for your work!
Regards,
someniatko