On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 12:01 AM Craig Francis <craig@craigfrancis.co.uk> wrote:
> is_literal can be used for strings because we can flag what’s
> user and what’s developer defined, and with Matthew’s request, it could do
> integers (because an integer value alone is not inherently risky, and it’s
> already used a lot).
To clarify, do you imply that *all* integers are safe? Or would they
also be differentiated into literal and non-literal varieties?
--
Best regards,
Bruce Weirdan mailto:weirdan@gmail.com