Re: Re: [RFC] is_literal

From: Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:10:19 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] is_literal
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-114943@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message 
Le 18/06/2021 à 08:00, Craig Francis a écrit :

As there’s been no issues raised with supporting integers, and doing so
will help adoption, the implementation will be updated to allow them.

Now to choose the name, with the options is_known() from Joe and
is_trusted() from Moritz:

https://strawpoll.com/bd2qed2xs

Keep in mind it might also become a dedicated type in the future.

Craig


If I'm understanding this correctly, what you call a literal value is a statically written and compiled string, which doesn't originate from a user given value, but was hardcoded at some point. If so, even if the primary use is of course for security concerns, the realty of what it does is not, it's mostly about how a certain variable was defined / assigned. How about is_static() or is_value_static() ? Or even is_statically_defined() ? There's many options in this path.

Regards,

--

Pierre

Thread (69 messages)

« previous php.internals (#114943) next »