Re: [RFC] is_literal

From: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:36:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] is_literal
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-114855@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message 
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 08:34, someniatko <someniatko@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am sure even without a dedicated type it is still a valuable addition to
> the engine [...] IMO it's okay to ship the feature without it for now.



Thanks someniatko, it's certainly something I'm interested in (8.2?), as I
think a dedicated type would be useful, I'm just cautious of trying to
cover too many things before the 8.1 deadline - especially because
types will be part of the native functions discussion.

Thread (69 messages)

« previous php.internals (#114855) next »