Re: Re: Improving Mailing-List interactions - was: [PHP-DEV] Moving PHP internals to GitHub
| From: | Andreas Heigl | Date: | Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:46:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Improving Mailing-List interactions - was: [PHP-DEV] Moving PHP internals to GitHub | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-120022@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hey
On 13.04.23 10:38, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc
Hi On 4/13/23 10:29, Andreas Heigl wrote:Apart from (possibly) modifying the body and the subject line which then breaks the DKIM signature which then breaks DMARC ;-) Cheers Andreas -- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | https://andreas.heigl.org | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | GPG-Key: https://hei.gl/keyandreasheiglorg | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+1. Remove modification of the emails on the lists server so that DKIM and DMARC will finally workYes, please, but for different reasons: Filtering is much more reliably performed using the 'list-id' header compared to a Subject prefix and not having the prefix in the Subject makes the INBOX more tidy when also having the [RFC] or [VOTE] prefixes. Also clients apparently can't decide whether to put the 'Re' before or after the prefix. DMARC is less of a concern, because the list apparently already performs DMARC mangling for a policy that is not 'none'
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc